<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for shutdown now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shutdownnow.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shutdownnow.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:49:13 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on government sponsored monopolies by Ryan</title>
		<link>http://shutdownnow.com/2009/09/18/government-sponsored-monopolies/comment-page-1#comment-3791</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shutdownnow.com/?p=145#comment-3791</guid>
		<description>I agree 100%.  The problem is that it&#039;s not an issue enough voters care about, but it&#039;s an issue that deep-pocketed copyright holders care about very much (i.e. spend money on).  I would rather see copyright return to the original 14 years.  I think the Statute of Anne got it right way back in 1709.  That being said, I would be willing to compromise and settle for reducing copyright terms to something like 40 years for &quot;works for hire&quot; and the life of the author for non &quot;works for hire&quot;.

(C) 2010 Ryan Durham
j/k</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree 100%.  The problem is that it&#8217;s not an issue enough voters care about, but it&#8217;s an issue that deep-pocketed copyright holders care about very much (i.e. spend money on).  I would rather see copyright return to the original 14 years.  I think the Statute of Anne got it right way back in 1709.  That being said, I would be willing to compromise and settle for reducing copyright terms to something like 40 years for &#8220;works for hire&#8221; and the life of the author for non &#8220;works for hire&#8221;.</p>
<p>(C) 2010 Ryan Durham<br />
j/k</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on nintendo and &#8230; by Dough</title>
		<link>http://shutdownnow.com/2009/03/21/wii-warranty/comment-page-1#comment-3790</link>
		<dc:creator>Dough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 01:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shutdownnow.com/?p=96#comment-3790</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s odd, I usually focus on getting it looking right in Firefox; are you using an older version of Firefox (though I&#039;m using the beta, so it could be my fault)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s odd, I usually focus on getting it looking right in Firefox; are you using an older version of Firefox (though I&#8217;m using the beta, so it could be my fault)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on nintendo and &#8230; by how to repair a wii</title>
		<link>http://shutdownnow.com/2009/03/21/wii-warranty/comment-page-1#comment-3789</link>
		<dc:creator>how to repair a wii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 05:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shutdownnow.com/?p=96#comment-3789</guid>
		<description>Hi, I thought I&#039;d post a comment and let you know your page layout is really messed up on the Firefox browser. Seems to work ok in IE though. Anyways keep up the great work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I thought I&#8217;d post a comment and let you know your page layout is really messed up on the Firefox browser. Seems to work ok in IE though. Anyways keep up the great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on eulas, oh my! by Dough</title>
		<link>http://shutdownnow.com/2009/03/21/eulas-oh-my/comment-page-1#comment-3583</link>
		<dc:creator>Dough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shutdownnow.com/?p=101#comment-3583</guid>
		<description>Bah, I just found out the frog analogy is useless: www.snopes.com/critters/wild/frogboil.asp and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boiling_frog. But it still doesn&#039;t change how many IP advocates are trying to make it possible to own ideas forever. They&#039;ve already convinced the general public that &quot;if I made it, I own it, it&#039;s mine!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bah, I just found out the frog analogy is useless: <a href="http://www.snopes.com/critters/wild/frogboil.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.snopes.com/critters/wild/frogboil.asp</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boiling_frog" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boiling_frog</a>. But it still doesn&#8217;t change how many IP advocates are trying to make it possible to own ideas forever. They&#8217;ve already convinced the general public that &#8220;if I made it, I own it, it&#8217;s mine!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on eulas, oh my! by Jeff Grandinetti</title>
		<link>http://shutdownnow.com/2009/03/21/eulas-oh-my/comment-page-1#comment-3446</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Grandinetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 21:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shutdownnow.com/?p=101#comment-3446</guid>
		<description>I wonder if sunkist would want their oranges returned after your body has &#039;processed&#039; them ;D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if sunkist would want their oranges returned after your body has &#8216;processed&#8217; them ;D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on eulas, oh my! by Dough</title>
		<link>http://shutdownnow.com/2009/03/21/eulas-oh-my/comment-page-1#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Dough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 03:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shutdownnow.com/?p=101#comment-142</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really hoping that people are actually smarter than the frogs from the frog analogy:

If you place a frog in a pot of hot water, it will immediately hop out. But if you place a frog in a pot of comfortable water, then slowly increase the temperature, it will stay in the water until it&#039;s dead.

That is, even though our consumer/end user rights are slowly being taken away, hopefully it doesn&#039;t get bad enough before we still have the ability to take them back. I just hope that consumers eventually wise up and start using their dollars to support non-EULA alternatives when possible; or, at the very least, EULAs without unconscionable terms. I&#039;ll post an entry on an idea I&#039;ve got later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really hoping that people are actually smarter than the frogs from the frog analogy:</p>
<p>If you place a frog in a pot of hot water, it will immediately hop out. But if you place a frog in a pot of comfortable water, then slowly increase the temperature, it will stay in the water until it&#8217;s dead.</p>
<p>That is, even though our consumer/end user rights are slowly being taken away, hopefully it doesn&#8217;t get bad enough before we still have the ability to take them back. I just hope that consumers eventually wise up and start using their dollars to support non-EULA alternatives when possible; or, at the very least, EULAs without unconscionable terms. I&#8217;ll post an entry on an idea I&#8217;ve got later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on eulas, oh my! by Jared</title>
		<link>http://shutdownnow.com/2009/03/21/eulas-oh-my/comment-page-1#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 01:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shutdownnow.com/?p=101#comment-141</guid>
		<description>...it&#039;s only a matter of time until your Sunkist nightmares are true.  (:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;it&#8217;s only a matter of time until your Sunkist nightmares are true.  (:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on why are you hitting yourself? by Jared</title>
		<link>http://shutdownnow.com/2009/03/14/why-are-you-hitting-yourself/comment-page-1#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 06:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shutdownnow.com/?p=92#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Loved...that...show.  Loved the book when I was a kid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved&#8230;that&#8230;show.  Loved the book when I was a kid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on pretentiousness and profanity by Dough</title>
		<link>http://shutdownnow.com/2009/03/03/pretentious/comment-page-1#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Dough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 02:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shutdownnow.com/?p=56#comment-128</guid>
		<description>Wow, got comments more quickly than usual. :) And I&#039;m completely surprised to see someone I don&#039;t know actually reading this crap.

Two things: they probably have more effect simply because of their label; and even though they do have more effect, it still doesn&#039;t make them worse.

Going off what Jared said -- isn&#039;t it actually more intelligent to be able to quickly and effectively communicate your point with fewer words? Why use 50 words to communicate your anger, surprise, or excitement when just a couple will do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, got comments more quickly than usual. :) And I&#8217;m completely surprised to see someone I don&#8217;t know actually reading this crap.</p>
<p>Two things: they probably have more effect simply because of their label; and even though they do have more effect, it still doesn&#8217;t make them worse.</p>
<p>Going off what Jared said &#8212; isn&#8217;t it actually more intelligent to be able to quickly and effectively communicate your point with fewer words? Why use 50 words to communicate your anger, surprise, or excitement when just a couple will do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on pretentiousness and profanity by Jared</title>
		<link>http://shutdownnow.com/2009/03/03/pretentious/comment-page-1#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shutdownnow.com/?p=56#comment-127</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve long thought the same thing: swear words are arbitrary.  Interestingly enough the quote from the Ensign is quite literal.  I like etymology and my sparse research has shown me exactly this: most &quot;swear words&quot; of today are simply the &quot;slang of the poor&quot; from centuries past.  Fornicate was F@&amp;# in the old world and S@#$ was used rather than defecate.  As people could simply not be seen as &quot;low class,&quot; they would refrain from using such words.  Hence, the reason they became &quot;bad.&quot;

Interestingly, you&#039;ll find the same thing among different linguistic cultures.  Did you ever wonder when watching a sub-titled movie if, say, portuguese really has a literal f-word?   

Having said all of this, I pretty much have always ignored social customs regarding this.  Of course, I know how to speak around who, but anymore, I could simply care less.  Unlike many others, I grew up hearing &quot;bad words&quot; all the time and have pretty much always used them.  It&#039;s just part of who I am and the people who accept this in me are the one around whom I feel most comfortable.  

PS, I always get a kick out of the &quot;low intelligence&quot; argument.  Some of the smartest people I know, swear the most.  I could certainly choose other words to express myself, but there&#039;s something about the simplicity of using one word as a noun/pronoun/verb/adjective that makes my day.  Oh, and sometimes I love shocking people.  (:  Whodda thunk?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve long thought the same thing: swear words are arbitrary.  Interestingly enough the quote from the Ensign is quite literal.  I like etymology and my sparse research has shown me exactly this: most &#8220;swear words&#8221; of today are simply the &#8220;slang of the poor&#8221; from centuries past.  Fornicate was F@&amp;# in the old world and S@#$ was used rather than defecate.  As people could simply not be seen as &#8220;low class,&#8221; they would refrain from using such words.  Hence, the reason they became &#8220;bad.&#8221;</p>
<p>Interestingly, you&#8217;ll find the same thing among different linguistic cultures.  Did you ever wonder when watching a sub-titled movie if, say, portuguese really has a literal f-word?   </p>
<p>Having said all of this, I pretty much have always ignored social customs regarding this.  Of course, I know how to speak around who, but anymore, I could simply care less.  Unlike many others, I grew up hearing &#8220;bad words&#8221; all the time and have pretty much always used them.  It&#8217;s just part of who I am and the people who accept this in me are the one around whom I feel most comfortable.  </p>
<p>PS, I always get a kick out of the &#8220;low intelligence&#8221; argument.  Some of the smartest people I know, swear the most.  I could certainly choose other words to express myself, but there&#8217;s something about the simplicity of using one word as a noun/pronoun/verb/adjective that makes my day.  Oh, and sometimes I love shocking people.  (:  Whodda thunk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
